I guess I had high hopes...,
December 4, 2008
I guess I had high hopes for these pens being a loyal uni-ball customer for many
years. As an Engineer I need a pen capable of writing very fine. I ordered 2
boxes for our Engineering department and within a day everyone officially hates
them, so this is not just my opinion. Out of the box every pen writes different.
Some write very well and others are extremely light and really lacking ink flow.
I left the bad ones in the box and handed out the good ones. They initally wrote
very well, but after 5 minutes of writing the ink flow began to severly skip and
soon after there was nothing but a very faint line. After several minutes of
scribbling and trying to restore the flow I gave up and switched to a new one.
Once again the same results. I think uni-ball needs to do some serious work on
their ink formula before these are any good at all. Overall we are extremely
dissapointed with these pens and I will probably return the whole lot.
I originally purchased...,
May 8, 2007
I originally purchased the .18mm bit because I wanted a mess free alternative to
field 'travel' sketch pens that were felt tipped like a Micron or messy like a
refillable drafting pen. These did the trick for the most part, though the
durability is complained about, they do out perform felt tips of the same size
by leaps and bounds, and are of course just as durable as the metal nib on a
drafting pen, though not quite as stiff because of the disposable plastic
construction. The only complaint that I have is reserved for the ink which
though abundant enough, has a grayer less dense quality about it than nearly
every other black ink I've used, the less vibrant ink is especially apparent
when used in conjunction with other black inks. I assume the ink formula is less
dense because of the lubricant that Uni-ball added for the use in their new
micro design. But again as a sketch pen it is splendid for fine crosshatching
and detail. Also great for small note taking in pocket journals. Four out of
Five.